When this blog was still in its infancy, I posted what remains one of my favorite shots, a picture of a bee on a flower. About a week ago, as I was going through some old shots, I came across a similar shot, shown here. It's the same flowers, just without the bee. While the bee certainly added something to the shot, the flowers alone were fun to photograph.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Flowers revisisted
When this blog was still in its infancy, I posted what remains one of my favorite shots, a picture of a bee on a flower. About a week ago, as I was going through some old shots, I came across a similar shot, shown here. It's the same flowers, just without the bee. While the bee certainly added something to the shot, the flowers alone were fun to photograph.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
bee-have nate!
I can't bee-lieve that it took me two months to post this picture.
Maybe if you hadn't bee-n so busy traveling abroad.
You guys are annoying the bee-jesus out of me with the punning like something out of a campy
(B)ee-movie that stars Bruce Campbell. I'll bee back when I can think of more so you all
bee-tter bee-ware!
I'm not a bee-g fan of bee-ts. I just don't like eating stuff that makes my pee purple.
Bee
Post a Comment